Discussion
Section editor – PhD in geology and mineralogy Averyanova O.Yu.
Article # 34_2019 submitted on 05/24/2019 displayed on website on 09/27/2019
11 p.
pdf Typification of extension cones in Achimov Formation of the Urengoy field
The application of the underwater extension cones (fans) classification of G. Reading and M. Richards and a comprehensive analysis of the geological and geophysical data concerning the Urengoy field, allowed us to identify geneticaly different extension cones within the same lithostratigraphical level (at a distance of less than 21 km). The underwater extension cones differ in morphological characteristics, in the size of the filtration-capacitive parameters (porosity, permeability) and in the nature of the effective thickness distribution in space. The typification of extension cones when assessing the hydrocarbon potential of poorly studied geological objects will make possible to correctly select their analogues.

Keywords: classification of underwater extension cones, typification of extension cones, Achimov Formation, Urengoy field.
article citation Mezentseva A.V., Baykov R.P., Zverev K.V., Solovyev V.V., Butkeev A.S., Ulybina I.V. Tipizatsiya konusov vynosa v achimovskikh otlozheniyakh Urengoyskogo mestorozhdeniya [Typification of extension cones in Achimov Formation of the Urengoy field]. Neftegazovaya Geologiya. Teoriya I Praktika, 2019, vol. 14, no. 3, available at: http://www.ngtp.ru/rub/2019/34_2019.html
DOI https://doi.org/10.17353/2070-5379/34_2019
References
   Deptugk M.E., Piper D.J.W., Savoye B., Gervais A. Dimensions and architecture of late Pleistocene submarine lobes off the northern margin of East Corsica // Sedimentology 55, 2008, pp. 869-898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00926.x
   Mutti E. Turbidites et cones sous-marins profonds, in Peter Homewood (Ed.). Sedimentation Detritique (Fluviatile, Littorale et Marine) // Institut de Geologie, Universite de Fribourg, Suisse, 1979, pp. 353-419.
   Mutti E., Ricci Lucchi F. Introduction to the excursions on siliciclastic turbidites: 2nd International Association of Sedimentologists European Regional Meeting Excursion Guidebook, Bologna, 1981, pp. 1–3.
   Mutti E., Normark W.R. Comparing examples of modern and ancient turbidite systems: Problems and concepts, in J.K. Leggett and G.G. Zuffa (eds.), Marine clastic sedimentology: Concepts and case studies // Graham & Trotman, London, 1987, pp. 1-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3241-8_1
   Nezhdanov A.A., Ponomarev V.A., Turenkov N.A., Gorbunov S.A. Geologiya i neftegazonosnost' achimovskoy tolshchi Zapadnoy Sibiri [Geology and petroleum potential of the Achimov Formation of Western Siberia]. Moscow: Akademiya gornykh nauk, 2000, 247 p.
   Posamentier H.W., Walker R.G. Facies models revisited // SEPM, 2006, pp. 399-521.
   Prelat A., Covault J.A., Hodson D.M., Fildani A., Flint S.S. Intrinsic controls on the range of volumes, morphologies, and dimensions of submarine lobes // Sedimentary Geology 232, 2010, pp. 66-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2010.09.010
   Reading H.G., Richards M. Turbidite systems in deep-water basin margins classified by grain size and feeder system // AAPG Bulletin, 1994, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 792-822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1306/a25fe3bf-171b-11d7-8645000102c1865d
   Zavala C., Mariano A. Intrabasinal and Extrabasinal turbidites: origin and distinctive characteristics // Sedimentary Geology 337, 2016, pp. 36-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2016.03.008